[ProAudio] The High-Resolution Challenge

[Glenn Meadows]

My only comment is that all sample rate converters are not the same. Study 
and listen. We've (Mayfield Mastering) spent a bunch of time doing that, 
and use an external software based. Expensive, but best we've found to date.

Glenn Meadows

On February 15, 2020 6:57:00 PM Bob Olhsson via ProAudio 
<proaudio at bach.pgm.com> wrote:
> By the same token, the reason to down-sample is to save space. We don’t 
> actually record at 48k. We record at much higher sample rates and then 
> down-sample to save storage.
>
> The real issue is when and by how much should we down sample. For 
> production, many of us feel down-sampling to no less than 96k yields better 
> sounding signal processing in a final 48 or 44.1k product than a chain of 
> up and down-sampled processes. It’s all about easier filtering.
>
> Bob Olhsson 615-562-4346
>
> From: Dan Lavry via ProAudio:The reason to up sample is to enable easier 
> filtering.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ProAudio mailing list
> ProAudio at bach.pgm.com
> http://bach.pgm.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bach.pgm.com/pipermail/proaudio/attachments/20200215/8bfb1814/attachment-0001.html>