<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Yes of course. I used special small size molecules to design my converters. My AD dynamic range is 128dB (A weight). When I remove the weighting, the molecules expand and it drops to 126dB. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Sadly, I feel it is important to state that I am joking. It seems like some people do fall for much of the BS. It is not restricted to politics ..</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards</div><div dir="auto">Dan Lavry</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div id="composer_signature" dir="auto"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br></div><div align="left" dir="auto" style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Mike Rivers via ProAudio <proaudio@bach.pgm.com> </div><div>Date: 6/14/21 8:34 AM (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: Louis Judson <loujudson@mac.com>, proaudio@bach.pgm.com </div><div>Subject: Re: [ProAudio] Microphones question </div><div><br></div></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/14/2021 11:26 AM, Louis Judson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">Even the
lowly Shure M-267 quoted -129…</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Arial">I was told that -128 dBu was a theoretical limit
because molecules couldn't get any smaller, but <br>
<br>
(1) That could be incorrect (the fact, the reason, or both)<br>
or<br>
(2) That didn't stop a creative marketing department<br>
</font><br>
<pre cols="72" class="moz-signature">--
For a good time call <a href="http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com</a></pre>
</body></html>