<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><font face="Arial">Hi Scott,</font></p>
    <p><font face="Arial">I used to refer to the MCI multi-tracks as
        "The works in a drawer." (Obviously, I "borrowed" that phrase).
        Since JW's facilities had MCI machines, perhaps that's where he
        got the idea.</font></p>
    <p><font face="Arial">Corey</font><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.baileyzone.net">www.baileyzone.net</a></pre>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/2/2020 10:38 AM, Scott Phillips
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMp+SuXGRwvo1P7et5jhSV2xZP_92d5H37fW7h7MsYgHt36igw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">MCI had this system in its 24 track machines also
        to reduce cross talk between adjacent channels of the heads. I
        can't say how effective it was, I never tried defeating it, it
        was pretty much hard wired in. It did allow for bouncing between
        adjacent tracks if you didn't get too carried away with record
        levels, or at least least they claimed it did.
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Scott</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Feb 2, 2020, 12:06 PM
          Corey Bailey Audio Engineering via ProAudio <<a
            href="mailto:proaudio@bach.pgm.com" moz-do-not-send="true">proaudio@bach.pgm.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <p><font face="Arial">Somewhat off topic but:</font></p>
            <p><font face="Arial">Some years ago, a colleague of mine
                (John Windt of Windt Audio) came up with a method of
                reducing the crosstalk on a 24 track recorder. It
                involved injecting a small amount of signal from the
                adjacent channels into the signal & phase cancelling
                some of the crosstalk. It actually helped somewhat but
                it made aligning a multitrack machine a real PITA so,
                the idea was abandoned. I remember trying to think of
                another use for those daughter boards.</font></p>
            <p><font face="Arial">Cheers,</font></p>
            <p><font face="Arial">Corey</font><br>
            </p>
            <pre cols="72">Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
<a href="http://www.baileyzone.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">www.baileyzone.net</a></pre>
            <div>On 1/30/2020 6:44 PM, Edward Gosfield III via ProAudio
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">But he also designed a stereo
              processing system which he intends to "remove crosstalk"
              through a set of methods including a 'universal filter',
              but culminating in individualized in-ear-canal
              measurements and a software package.</blockquote>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          ProAudio mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:ProAudio@bach.pgm.com" target="_blank"
            rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">ProAudio@bach.pgm.com</a><br>
          <a href="http://bach.pgm.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">http://bach.pgm.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>