[ProAudio] HX Pro was :FeralA - Recordings released encoded with Dolby A

[Alan Garren]

yes, I was casting about in my head for the appropriate work to call HX, 
process seemed most likely.

the point is that, as you point out, it modulates the bias, which should 
then change the location of the trailing edge? What affect does this 
have on the bias signal on the tape for John and Jaime to process?

Cheers

Alan


On 2/11/2020 11:03 AM, Bill Whitlock wrote:
> I'd hesitate to call HX Pro a "process".  All HX Pro does is to 
> account for the fact that HF program material tends to "bias" itself 
> and that this HF program content, when combined with fixed ultrasonic 
> bias results in significant self-erasure and loss of HF MOL (maximum 
> HF level residual on the tape).  So HX Pro simply modulates the 
> ultrasonic bias so that the combined effect of program HF bias plus 
> ultrasonic bias remains constant.  Depending on tape and speed, it can 
> improve HF "headroom" or maximum HF audio output level by up to 6 or 8 
> dB. It doesn't change frequency response of the record/play process - 
> except at levels where MOL/saturation is an issue. I guess it 
> technically is a "process" but it's record side only, no "decoding" 
> needed.
>
> Hope that made sense. Lots of folks actually believe(d) that HX Pro 
> was another noise reduction system. It's not of course, it's simply a 
> way to get the most out of a given tape at high audio frequencies. Not 
> so much an issue at 15 IPS, but really a big deal at 1-7/8 IPS - where 
> it can make ordinary iron oxide tape perform like chrome.
>
> Bill Whitlock
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Garren via ProAudio <proaudio at bach.pgm.com>
> To: John Chester <jkc at jkc-lab.com>; proaudio <proaudio at bach.pgm.com>
> Sent: Tue, Feb 11, 2020 10:42 am
> Subject: [ProAudio] HX Pro was :FeralA - Recordings released encoded 
> with Dolby A
>
> On 2/11/2020 10:12 AM, John Chester via ProAudio wrote:
> > Why does perfect azimuth adjustment usually not produce minimum
> > interchannel time difference?  The most obvious answer is gap scatter
> > in the record head, but there are others.  Record EQ may not be
> > precisely matched, and bias setting may be different. Recording occurs
> > at a point slightly past the trailing edge of the record head gap, and
> > that distance varies as bias level changes.
>
>
> This causes me to wonder if you have had to try this on an HX processed
> tape. I am only aware of one pro deck with HX Pro, the studer A820, and
> most people leave it turned off anyway. But it is there on some later
> models. (possibly on the A827 as well, can't remember)
>
> Seems like a horror story for your process, chasing a HF modulated bias
> level.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Alan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ProAudio mailing list
> ProAudio at bach.pgm.com <mailto:ProAudio at bach.pgm.com>
> http://bach.pgm.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bach.pgm.com/pipermail/proaudio/attachments/20200211/3ec1dabf/attachment.html>